Petro calls detention of Colombian workers in disputed territory 'illegal kidnapping'

Two Colombian workers detained by Peruvian authorities; one has been released and returned to Leticia while the other remains under investigation.
Colombia considers that the island has not been properly awarded
President Petro's statement rejecting Peru's territorial claim under the Rio de Janeiro Protocol.

Two Colombian contractors were detained by Peruvian police while conducting bathymetric surveys for a dock expansion project in Leticia, Colombia. Peru's Public Ministry opened a preliminary investigation charging the workers with crimes against national sovereignty, claiming they attempted to establish the territory as Colombian.

  • Two Colombian contractors detained by Peruvian police on August 13, 2025
  • They were conducting bathymetric surveys for a dock expansion project in Leticia
  • Peru's Public Ministry opened investigation charging them with crimes against national sovereignty
  • Colombia's President Petro called the detention 'illegal kidnapping' and rejected Peru's claim to Santa Rosa de Loreto island
  • One worker (Torrado) was released; the other (Sánchez) remained under investigation

Colombian President Gustavo Petro condemned the detention of two Colombian workers in disputed territory as illegal, claiming Peru has no jurisdiction over Santa Rosa de Loreto island under the Rio de Janeiro Protocol.

On the afternoon of Tuesday, August 13th, river transport workers in the Amazon region reported suspicious activity to authorities. Two men were moving through the waters near Santa Rosa de Loreto, a settlement on Chinería island, conducting what appeared to be surveying work. By evening, Peruvian National Police had detained them. Their names were John Willington Ama and Carlos Sánchez. Within hours, the incident had escalated into a diplomatic confrontation over territory that both nations claim.

The two men were not spies or smugglers. They were contractors working for a Colombian consortium called Inges & M2020, hired to conduct bathymetric studies—underwater measurements—as part of a larger project to expand the Victoria Regia dock in Leticia, Colombia. Sánchez was a surveyor. Ama had been hired to operate the boat. They had crossed into the disputed waters to gather data needed for the dock expansion. According to their lawyers, they were doing preliminary work for construction. According to Peru's immigration authorities, they had no permission to be there.

The Colombian government moved quickly. President Gustavo Petro posted on X that the detention was "illegal" and constituted "kidnapping." He restated Colombia's long-standing position: that Santa Rosa de Loreto, and the island of Chinería itself, do not belong to Peru. Colombia's argument rests on the Rio de Janeiro Protocol, a treaty that Petro claims has never properly awarded the territory to Peru. The language was sharp and unambiguous. This was not a misunderstanding between neighbors. This was a sovereign nation rejecting another's authority over the land in question.

Colombia's Transport Minister, Maria Fernanda Rojas, provided more detail. She identified the detained men as Juan Daniel Torrado, a site inspector, and Carlos Sánchez, the topographer. Torrado, she said, had already been released and returned to Leticia. Sánchez remained detained. The work they were doing was legitimate, contracted under Invías agreement 1729 from 2020, part of the dock expansion project. They had hired Ama as their boat operator and proceeded to the island to take measurements. Then the Peruvian police arrived.

Peru's response was to treat the incident as a matter of national security. The Public Ministry, through the Provincial Criminal Prosecutor's Office of Mariscal Ramón Castilla, opened a preliminary investigation. The charges were serious: crimes against national sovereignty, specifically acts intended to "subject the republic to foreign domination." According to the prosecutor's initial findings, the men had attempted to establish the territory as Colombian land. Police conducted a technical inspection of the area, collected statements from the detainees and the officers who arrested them, gathered video evidence, and formally inquired with immigration about whether the Colombians had legal authorization to enter Peruvian territory. The answer was no.

What happened on that Tuesday afternoon was not an isolated incident. It was a collision between two competing claims to the same piece of earth, claims that have never been fully resolved. The Rio de Janeiro Protocol, signed in 1942, was meant to settle border disputes between the two nations. Colombia argues it left this particular territory in limbo. Peru argues it belongs to them. Two workers taking measurements became the physical embodiment of that disagreement. One was released. One remained in custody. And the question of who actually owns Santa Rosa de Loreto remained exactly where it has been for decades—unresolved, and now more tense than before.

The detention of the Colombian contractors on the island of Santa Rosa is illegal. It is kidnapping. Colombia considers that the island of Santa Rosa has not been properly awarded according to the Rio de Janeiro Protocol.
— President Gustavo Petro of Colombia
The workers were conducting bathymetric studies as part of a legitimate contract for the expansion of the Victoria Regia dock in Leticia.
— Colombian Transport Minister Maria Fernanda Rojas
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why would two workers taking measurements become a diplomatic incident?

Model

Because the measurements themselves are a claim. If you're surveying land for a construction project, you're treating it as yours. Peru saw that act as a challenge to its sovereignty.

Inventor

But they were just doing their job for a dock project in Leticia, which is clearly Colombian.

Model

The dock is in Leticia, yes. But the island where they were measuring—Santa Rosa de Loreto—sits in disputed waters. Colombia says Peru has no right to be there. Peru says Colombia is the one overstepping.

Inventor

So this is really about the Rio de Janeiro Protocol?

Model

It's about what that protocol actually settled. Colombia reads it one way, Peru reads it another. This incident just made the disagreement impossible to ignore.

Inventor

Was the detention justified?

Model

That depends on which country's law you're asking. From Peru's perspective, two foreign nationals entered their territory without authorization and conducted surveying work. From Colombia's perspective, they were working in Colombian waters and Peru had no right to stop them.

Inventor

What happens to the detained worker now?

Model

That's the open question. He's under investigation for crimes against sovereignty. But the real issue isn't what happens to him—it's whether this pushes the two countries closer to resolving the territorial question, or further apart.

Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en RPP ↗
Contáctanos FAQ