Connect young people across borders, and you reshape a region
Erasmus will expand beyond EU borders to include students from Egypt, Algeria, Jordan, Israel, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Palestine, Syria, and Tunisia. The pact encompasses over 100 projects including infrastructure, 5G networks, and youth initiatives, with EU doubling its regional budget commitment to €42 billion.
- Erasmus expands to 11 non-EU Mediterranean countries: Egypt, Algeria, Jordan, Israel, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Palestine, Syria, Tunisia
- EU commits €42 billion to the Pact for the Mediterranean, doubling previous regional spending
- The pact includes over 100 projects spanning 5G networks, infrastructure, and youth programmes
The EU plans to extend its Erasmus exchange programme to 11 Mediterranean countries including Egypt, Morocco, and Palestine as part of a broader €42 billion 'Pact for the Mediterranean' initiative.
The European Union announced Thursday that it would open its flagship Erasmus student exchange programme to young people from eleven Mediterranean countries outside its borders, a move that signals a significant shift in how Brussels approaches education and mobility in the region. The expansion is part of a larger diplomatic initiative called the Pact for the Mediterranean, which pairs the educational outreach with a commitment to double EU spending in the region to €42 billion.
The countries gaining access to Erasmus through this arrangement are Egypt, Algeria, Jordan, Israel, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Palestine, Syria, and Tunisia. For decades, Erasmus has been primarily a European affair, allowing students from member states to study and intern across the continent. This extension represents a recognition that the Mediterranean basin—stretching from North Africa through the Middle East—shares enough common interests and challenges with Europe to warrant deeper institutional ties.
Kaya Callas, the EU's foreign policy chief, framed the pact as a comprehensive effort to bind the region together through infrastructure and people-to-people connections. The initiative encompasses more than one hundred separate projects, ranging from the unglamorous but essential work of building 5G networks and undersea cables to more visible investments in rail, road, and maritime links. The breadth suggests the EU sees this not as a narrow educational initiative but as a foundational reshaping of how the Mediterranean functions as an economic and social space.
Dubravka Suica, the EU commissioner responsible for Mediterranean affairs, emphasized that the agreement aims to "connect young people" by expanding not just Erasmus but also Horizon Europe, the EU's research and innovation funding programme. The logic is straightforward: if young Egyptians, Moroccans, and Palestinians can study alongside Europeans, if researchers from Beirut can collaborate with labs in Berlin, the region becomes less fragmented and more integrated into European networks of opportunity.
The pact also signals a reframing of migration—historically a source of tension between Europe and its southern neighbors—as something other than a crisis to be managed. Suica described migration as "the biggest common challenge" but also "a common opportunity" for both sides. This language suggests the EU is attempting to move beyond the zero-sum framing that has dominated European migration debates for years, instead positioning mobility as something that can benefit both regions if properly structured and supported.
The timing and scale of the commitment reflect broader geopolitical calculations. As Europe seeks to strengthen ties with Mediterranean partners and compete for influence in the region, educational and economic integration offers a softer form of engagement than military or diplomatic pressure. By making it easier for young people from these countries to access European education and research opportunities, the EU is betting that shared experiences and networks will create constituencies in those countries with a stake in closer European ties.
The announcement leaves several questions unresolved: how quickly the programmes will be implemented, what funding mechanisms will support students from less wealthy countries, and whether all eleven countries will participate equally or whether geopolitical tensions might complicate participation. But the direction is clear. The EU is attempting to build a more integrated Mediterranean region, starting with the young people who will shape it.
Notable Quotes
The agreement aims to connect young people and expand the Erasmus Plus and Horizon Europe programmes— Dubravka Suica, EU Commissioner for the Mediterranean
Migration is the biggest common challenge and a common opportunity for both sides— Dubravka Suica, EU Commissioner for the Mediterranean
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Why extend Erasmus now, to these particular countries? What changed?
The EU is thinking about the Mediterranean as a strategic space. These countries sit on Europe's southern border, and they're dealing with the same challenges—migration, economic development, digital infrastructure. Erasmus becomes a tool for integration.
But some of these countries have tense relationships with each other. Israel and Palestine, for instance. How does that work in practice?
That's the real test. On paper, the pact treats them as equal partners in a shared regional project. In reality, the EU will have to navigate those tensions carefully. The hope is that institutional frameworks—shared programmes, common projects—can create space for cooperation even when politics are difficult.
Is this really about education, or is it about influence?
It's both. Education is influence, but it's the kind that works slowly and through genuine connection. When a Moroccan student studies in Madrid or a Lebanese researcher collaborates with a German lab, that creates real ties. The EU isn't hiding that this serves its interests—it does. But it's not cynical. These programmes genuinely benefit the students involved.
The €42 billion figure—is that new money or repackaged spending?
The source says the EU is doubling its budget for the region, so it appears to be an increase. But the devil's in the implementation. Whether that money actually reaches these programmes, and how quickly, will determine whether this is transformative or just another announcement.
What happens if a country drops out or becomes unstable?
That's the vulnerability. Syria is in the list, for example, and the situation there remains deeply uncertain. The pact assumes a level of regional stability that doesn't always exist. But the EU is betting that creating these connections now might actually help stabilize the region over time.