US Military Exercise in Caracas Signals Shifting Venezuela Dynamics

Our government has a gun to its head. They have kidnapped our president.
A Caracas resident explains why the interim government authorized the American military exercise despite political risks.

En una mañana de sábado que habría sido inimaginable hace apenas unos meses, dos helicópteros militares estadounidenses aterrizaron en la Embajada de Estados Unidos en Caracas, marcando el primer ejercicio militar conjunto entre ambos países en más de dos décadas. El general Francis Donovan, al mando del Comando Sur, supervisó la maniobra como expresión tangible del deshielo diplomático iniciado en marzo, cinco meses después de la captura de Nicolás Maduro. Lo que para algunos representó un signo de estabilidad, para otros encarnó la vieja herida del intervencionismo: Venezuela, una vez más, negocia su lugar en el mundo entre fuerzas que la exceden.

  • Dos Osprey MV-22B sobrevolaron Caracas con el peso simbólico de décadas de ruptura: era la primera presencia militar estadounidense autorizada en Venezuela desde que Chávez cortó lazos con el Pentágono en 2005.
  • El general Donovan aterrizó no solo para supervisar un ejercicio, sino para enviar una señal inequívoca: el nuevo gobierno venezolano está dispuesto a cooperar con Washington en materia de seguridad hemisférica.
  • Activistas chavistas respondieron con banderas y consignas contra la 'injerencia yanqui', mientras ciudadanos comunes observaban el aterrizaje con curiosidad, divididos entre el asombro y la inquietud.
  • Una intérprete de 28 años lo resumió con crudeza: 'Nuestro gobierno tiene un arma en la cabeza', aludiendo a la detención de Maduro como la sombra que condiciona cada decisión del gobierno interino.
  • El ejercicio concluyó sin incidentes, pero dejó expuesta la fractura profunda entre quienes ven en la cooperación con Estados Unidos una salida y quienes la interpretan como una traición al legado antiimperialista.

Dos helicópteros militares estadounidenses descendieron sobre la Embajada de Estados Unidos en Caracas un sábado por la mañana, levantando polvo y hojas mientras decenas de residentes observaban desde puntos cercanos. Los Bell Boeing MV-22B Osprey habían volado desde una base a tres horas de distancia como parte de un ejercicio de respuesta rápida supervisado por el general Francis Donovan, comandante del Comando Sur de Estados Unidos. La maniobra habría sido impensable meses atrás: durante más de dos décadas, la presencia militar estadounidense en Venezuela había sido prohibida.

El ejercicio marcó un giro radical en la relación bilateral. Siete años habían pasado desde que Maduro cortó los lazos militares con Washington, continuando una política iniciada por Chávez en 2005 en el marco de una reorientación hacia Rusia, Cuba e Irán. Pero con Maduro detenido desde hace cinco meses y un gobierno interino encabezado por Delcy Rodríguez, el escenario cambió. El 5 de marzo, Caracas y Washington restablecieron relaciones diplomáticas. Este ejercicio fue la dimensión militar de ese deshielo.

En las calles de Caracas, la reacción se dividió con nitidez. Augusto Pérez, ingeniero de 70 años, se apostó para ver el aterrizaje con curiosidad. Oscar García, contador de 60, lo describió como una señal de estabilidad. Pero al otro lado de la ciudad, activistas chavistas se congregaron con banderas venezolanas y la consigna 'No al ejercicio yanqui'. Fita González, intérprete de 28 años, reconoció la realidad política con amargura: 'Nuestro gobierno tiene un arma en la cabeza. No podemos olvidar que tienen secuestrado a nuestro presidente'.

Inés Vivas, profesora universitaria de 69 años, enmarcó la presencia militar estadounidense como parte de una condición de guerra permanente, invocando los agravios históricos que han alimentado el antiamericanismo venezolano durante décadas. El ejercicio concluyó sin incidentes, pero dejó expuesta una fractura que ningún helicóptero puede cerrar: la que separa a quienes ven en la cooperación con Washington una oportunidad de estabilidad y a quienes la interpretan como la rendición definitiva de un proyecto político.

Two American military helicopters descended toward the United States Embassy in Caracas on a Saturday morning, their rotors kicking up dust and leaves across the parking lot as dozens of residents watched from nearby vantage points. The Bell Boeing MV-22B Ospreys had flown in from a base three hours away, part of a coordinated military exercise that would have been unthinkable just months earlier. General Francis Donovan, commander of the U.S. Southern Command, was aboard, overseeing what Washington called a "rapid military response" drill—a demonstration of capability that carried unmistakable political weight in a country where American military presence had been forbidden for more than two decades.

The exercise marked a stark reversal in Venezuela's relationship with the United States. Seven years had passed since Nicolás Maduro severed military ties with Washington, continuing a policy Hugo Chávez had initiated in 2005 as part of a broader pivot toward Russia, Cuba, and Iran. That rupture had been ideological and complete. Now, with Maduro captured five months earlier and an interim government led by Delcy Rodríguez in place, the calculus had shifted. On March 5th, Caracas and Washington restored diplomatic relations. This exercise was the military dimension of that thaw—a signal that the new Venezuelan authorities were willing to cooperate with the Pentagon on security matters affecting the hemisphere.

The Venezuelan foreign ministry had announced the drill just two days before it occurred, framing it as a routine coordination between allied governments. The helicopters would conduct controlled overflights of the city and land at the embassy, officials explained. General Donovan would meet with interim government leaders, observe the exercise, and participate in bilateral security discussions. The U.S. Southern Command released a statement emphasizing commitment to implementing the American president's three-phase plan for Venezuela, "particularly the stabilization of Venezuela," and underscored the importance of shared security across the Western Hemisphere.

On the ground in Caracas, the reaction split sharply along political lines. Augusto Pérez, a seventy-year-old engineer, positioned himself at a vantage point to watch the landing, curious to witness something he had never seen before. Oscar García, a sixty-year-old accountant, also observed the arrival and described it as interesting, even reassuring—a sign of stability. But across the city, chavista activists gathered in protest. A handful of hard-line supporters of the old government assembled with Venezuelan flags bearing the message "No to the Yankee drill." Fita González, a twenty-eight-year-old interpreter, acknowledged the military exercise as an unwelcome intrusion but recognized the political reality: the interim government had little choice. "Our government has a gun to its head," she said, referencing Maduro's detention. "We can't forget that they have kidnapped our president."

Inés Vivas, a sixty-nine-year-old university professor, framed the American military presence as part of an ongoing condition of war. "We've been under a state of war since they bombed us," she said, invoking the historical grievances that had animated Venezuelan anti-American sentiment for decades. The protest reflected a deeper anxiety among chavista constituencies about what normalized military cooperation with the United States might portend—a fear that the interim government's pragmatism represented a capitulation to American interests.

Yet the exercise proceeded without incident. The helicopters landed, the drills were conducted, and General Donovan completed his second official visit to Venezuela since the political transition. The interim government, preparing for petroleum negotiations in India the following week, had authorized the exercise as part of its effort to stabilize the country and rebuild international relationships. For Washington, the drill demonstrated that Venezuela's new authorities were willing partners in regional security arrangements. For chavista opponents, it symbolized a betrayal of the anti-imperialist foreign policy that had defined the Chávez era. And for ordinary Caracas residents, it was simply an unusual Saturday morning—a reminder that their country's place in the world was being redrawn in real time.

Our government has a gun to its head. We can't forget that they have kidnapped our president.
— Fita González, interpreter
We've been under a state of war since they bombed us.
— Inés Vivas, university professor
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why would an interim government authorize American military helicopters to fly over its capital? That seems like a significant political risk.

Model

Because they're trying to signal stability to the international community and to their own population. After Maduro's capture, Venezuela needed to show it could govern, that it had backing from major powers. Normalizing military ties with the U.S. sends that message.

Inventor

But the chavistas protested. Doesn't that suggest the government is fracturing?

Model

It does, but the interim government is betting that most Venezuelans care more about basic security and economic recovery than ideological purity. The protesters are real, but they're also a minority now. The government is making a calculation that it can absorb that opposition.

Inventor

What does General Donovan's presence actually mean? Is this just theater?

Model

It's not theater, but it's not an invasion either. It's a statement that the U.S. military is now comfortable operating in Venezuela again, and that the interim government welcomes it. That changes the security architecture of the region.

Inventor

So this is permanent? Will American helicopters be landing in Caracas regularly now?

Model

That's the question no one can answer yet. This exercise is a proof of concept. If the interim government consolidates power and the U.S. sees Venezuela as stable, then yes, military cooperation will likely deepen. If things destabilize, all bets are off.

Inventor

What about the people who watched from the street? What did they think they were seeing?

Model

Most of them were just witnessing something they'd never seen before—American military hardware in their city. For some, it meant reassurance. For others, it meant occupation. Both reactions are real, and both will shape how Venezuelans respond to what comes next.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em Clarin ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ