He is a contractor. Calcagno pays him to provide content advice.
Calcagno claims Feito's contract ended due to non-compliance and contract abandonment, not dismissal, rejecting leaked audio allegations. Eyzaguirre is confirmed as a paid content advisor, not the program's secret owner, despite longstanding rumors linking him to the show.
- Gastón Calcagno claims sole ownership of Sin Filtros and Mediapromax production company
- Gonzalo Feito's contract ended over refusal to agree to live-broadcast-only format, not dismissal
- Sebastián Eyzaguirre is a paid content consultant, not the hidden owner, though he shapes on-air content
- Leaked audio of Eyzaguirre confronting Feito dates to 2023, when Feito created competing web format
Gastón Calcagno, owner of political discussion program Sin Filtros, denied firing journalist Gonzalo Feito and clarified Sebastián Eyzaguirre's role as a content consultant rather than hidden owner.
Gastón Calcagno, the man who says he owns the political talk show Sin Filtros, finally spoke up this week to set the record straight. He was tired of the noise—the leaked audio, the rumors, the versions of events that didn't match his own. What he wanted to say, above all else, was this: he is the sole owner of the production company Mediapromax and the sole owner of Sin Filtros. No one else. Not Gonzalo Feito, the journalist who recently departed. And definitely not Sebastián Eyzaguirre, the controversial figure whose voice appeared in a leaked recording from the show "Que Te Lo Digo."
In an interview with Radio Bío Bío, Calcagno rejected the narrative that Feito had been fired. The leaked audio seemed to show Eyzaguirre cursing Feito out, throwing him out of the program. But Calcagno said that wasn't what happened at all. Feito wasn't an employee in the traditional sense—he was a contractor, a service provider. The relationship ended, Calcagno explained, because Feito wouldn't agree to new terms. The main demand was simple: Sin Filtros needed to broadcast live every episode. Until then, some had been recorded in advance. Feito resisted signing on to that change. He didn't show up to work as expected. He violated confidentiality agreements. He generated internal problems. By the time the lawyers got involved, Calcagno said, Feito had effectively abandoned the contract.
Feito's own account differed. He said negotiations had broken down—he didn't confirm or deny being fired. He claimed the Sin Filtros team had grown jealous when he started a new show on Porcel TV, and he suggested that Eyzaguirre's audio had something to do with his exit. Calcagno flatly denied the jealousy angle. He said he didn't even know Feito had another program.
The bigger mystery, though, was Eyzaguirre himself. For years, rumors had circulated that the former CQC personality was the real owner of Sin Filtros, hiding in the background to protect the show's reputation with sponsors. Eyzaguirre has faced violence allegations and carries baggage in the press. There was even an audio of him yelling at staff over some program matter. A former panelist claimed Eyzaguirre had tried to influence his segment behind the scenes, which is why he didn't return.
When asked directly about Eyzaguirre's role, Calcagno was emphatic: he is not the owner. He is a contractor. Calcagno pays him—or rather, pays his company—to provide content advice. "He's very good and very talented," Calcagno said. And yes, Eyzaguirre does shape what happens on the show. He creates much of what Feito says on camera. He advises on content, on how segments are built, on the overall direction. That's what consulting means, Calcagno said. Genius sometimes requires a guiding hand.
As for the audio itself, Calcagno offered a timeline. The recording was from 2023, he said, a moment when tensions flared because Feito had developed a web format called "Quién Paga la Fiesta"—Who Pays the Party—that copied what Sin Filtros was already doing. That's when Eyzaguirre lost his temper. The audio, in other words, was old news, a snapshot of a specific conflict, not evidence of a firing that happened this week.
What remains unresolved is the fundamental question: who really left, and why. Calcagno's version is one of contractual failure and abandoned obligations. Feito's is one of broken negotiations and jealousy. The truth, as usual, sits somewhere in the middle—or perhaps nowhere at all. What is clear is that Sin Filtros continues, Feito is gone, and Eyzaguirre remains in the shadows, advising, shaping, creating. The show goes on.
Notable Quotes
Here the sole owner of the production company is me, the sole owner of Sin Filtros is me.— Gastón Calcagno
Sebastián is contracted by me to provide content advice. He creates many of the things Gonzalo says on camera.— Gastón Calcagno
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
So Calcagno says Feito wasn't fired—he just abandoned the contract. But the audio sounds like a firing. How do you square that?
The audio is from 2023, according to Calcagno. It's old. By the time this week happened, the legal argument was already made: Feito didn't comply, didn't show up, violated confidentiality. The firing language came later, from lawyers, not from Eyzaguirre in that moment.
And Eyzaguirre—is he really just a consultant, or is that a cover story?
Calcagno admits Eyzaguirre creates much of what appears on the show. He shapes content, advises on segments. That's not nothing. But it's different from owning the company. The rumor has always been that Eyzaguirre owns it secretly. Calcagno denies that flatly.
Why would they hide his ownership if he's already so involved?
Because Eyzaguirre has a reputation problem. Violence allegations, bad press. Sponsors might not want their ads next to his name. So you keep him as a consultant, let him do the work, but keep his name off the letterhead.
Does Feito's version—that they got jealous about his other show—hold up?
Calcagno says he didn't even know about it. But Feito started that show around the same time the contract dispute heated up. Whether jealousy was the real reason or just the excuse Feito used, we don't know. Both men have incentive to lie.
So what actually happened?
A contractor and a production company had a disagreement about terms. The contractor didn't sign. The company said he abandoned the job. The contractor said negotiations failed. Both are probably right in their own way.