Nuclear issues cannot be resolved in 72 hours
En las intersecciones del poder y la desconfianza, Washington y Teherán se encuentran una vez más ante el umbral de un acuerdo que ninguno puede firmar con prisa. La administración Trump ha postergado la formalización de un marco nuclear vinculado a la reapertura del Estrecho de Ormuz, reconociendo que las brechas técnicas y políticas aún no han sido salvadas. Es la vieja tensión entre la urgencia diplomática y la prudencia estratégica, jugada esta vez sobre uno de los corredores energéticos más vitales del mundo.
- A pesar de señales que apuntaban a un acuerdo inminente, la Casa Blanca frenó la firma al constatar que persisten diferencias técnicas y políticas sin resolver entre Washington y Teherán.
- El borrador propone reabrir el Estrecho de Ormuz al comercio global de petróleo a cambio de alivio parcial de sanciones estadounidenses y el levantamiento de un bloqueo naval sobre puertos iraníes.
- El líder supremo iraní Mojtaba Jamenei habría respaldado la estructura general del acuerdo, pero los procesos de aprobación internos en Irán avanzan con lentitud y los detalles críticos siguen sin cerrarse.
- Senadores republicanos cuestionan la coherencia de negociar concesiones tras la ofensiva militar lanzada contra Irán en febrero, mientras Rubio defiende el proceso desde Nueva Delhi.
- Teherán aún no ha aceptado entregar sus reservas de uranio altamente enriquecido, el punto más sensible de la negociación, dejando en suspenso cualquier compromiso nuclear vinculante.
La Casa Blanca no firmará este domingo ningún acuerdo con Irán, pese a las señales de las últimas horas que apuntaban a un desenlace inminente. Funcionarios de la administración Trump creen que el entendimiento sobre la reapertura del Estrecho de Ormuz y un marco nuclear podría concretarse en los próximos días, pero reconocen que las brechas técnicas y políticas entre Washington y Teherán siguen abiertas.
El acuerdo en discusión desbloquearía uno de los pasos marítimos más estratégicos del planeta a cambio de un alivio parcial de sanciones estadounidenses y el levantamiento de un bloqueo naval sobre puertos iraníes. Un alto funcionario confirmó que el líder supremo iraní ha respaldado la estructura general del entendimiento, aunque advirtió que los mecanismos de aprobación dentro del gobierno iraní son lentos y que los detalles aún deben cerrarse. El borrador contempla además una extensión de 60 días del alto al fuego mientras continúan las negociaciones nucleares.
Trump publicó en Truth Social que las conversaciones avanzan de forma constructiva, pero instruyó a su equipo negociador a proceder con cautela y garantizar que cualquier acuerdo final beneficie genuinamente a los intereses estadounidenses. El secretario de Estado Marco Rubio, desde India, rechazó las críticas republicanas que consideran las concesiones demasiado generosas, calificando de absurda la idea de que Trump aceptaría fortalecer la posición nuclear iraní. Rubio aclaró que las negociaciones sobre enriquecimiento de uranio comenzarán una vez que el Estrecho de Ormuz sea reabierto.
Sin embargo, la lógica del acuerdo genera tensiones dentro del propio partido republicano. Senadores aliados de Trump cuestionan por qué la administración lanzó una ofensiva militar contra Irán en febrero si ahora planea aliviar sanciones y permitir la reanudación de exportaciones de petróleo iraní. A ello se suma que Teherán no ha aceptado aún entregar su reserva de uranio altamente enriquecido, el punto más delicado de toda la negociación. Lo que ocurra en la próxima semana definirá si este marco se convierte en acuerdo vinculante o en otra iniciativa estancada.
The White House is not signing an agreement with Iran this Sunday, despite signals over the past day suggesting a deal was imminent. Instead, officials in the Trump administration believe the accord on reopening the Strait of Hormuz and establishing a nuclear framework could materialize within the next few days, as technical and political gaps between Washington and Tehran remain unresolved.
The proposed arrangement would unlock one of the world's most critical oil passages in exchange for partial relief from American sanctions and the removal of a naval blockade on Iranian ports. A senior U.S. official confirmed that Iran's supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, has endorsed the general structure of the understanding, but cautioned that details still need to be finalized and that approval processes within the Iranian government move slowly. The draft also includes a 60-day ceasefire extension while nuclear negotiations continue.
On Sunday, Trump posted on Truth Social that talks with Iran are progressing constructively, though he instructed his negotiating team to move deliberately and ensure any final agreement is genuinely beneficial to American interests. He emphasized that Iran cannot develop or acquire nuclear weapons. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking during an official visit to India, defended the draft against criticism from Republican quarters who view the concessions as too generous. Rubio rejected the notion that Trump would accept a deal strengthening Iran's nuclear position, calling such a scenario absurd. He also stated that serious negotiations on uranium enrichment and nuclear disarmament would begin once the Strait of Hormuz reopens, noting that nuclear issues cannot be resolved in 72 hours.
Yet the potential accord has drawn fire from within Republican ranks. Senators and Trump allies have questioned why the administration launched a military offensive against Iran in late February if it ultimately plans to ease sanctions and allow Iranian oil exports to resume. The logic appears contradictory to critics who see the deal as a reversal of that earlier posture.
Uncertainty also clouds the nuclear commitments themselves. Reuters reported that Tehran has not yet agreed to surrender its stockpile of highly enriched uranium, one of the most sensitive points in the negotiation. This gap underscores how much work remains before any signature becomes possible. The administration's patience with the process—and its willingness to let talks unfold over days rather than hours—suggests officials recognize that rushing toward a ceremonial signing would be premature. What happens in the coming week will determine whether this framework becomes binding agreement or another stalled initiative.
Citações Notáveis
The idea that the president would accept a deal putting Iran in a stronger nuclear position is absurd. That simply will not happen.— Secretary of State Marco Rubio
Conversations with Iran are advancing constructively, but the eventual agreement must be truly positive for the United States.— Trump, via Truth Social
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Why delay the signing if both sides have already agreed on the main points?
Because the main points and the details are not the same thing. Khamenei approved the general shape, but there are technical gaps that could unravel the whole thing if they're not closed first. A premature signature would just create a new problem.
What's the actual leverage here? Why would Iran agree to reopen the strait in exchange for partial sanctions relief?
The strait blockade has been strangling their economy. Oil exports are their lifeline. Partial relief is better than total isolation, and they get a 60-day window to negotiate the nuclear piece without immediate military pressure.
But Republicans are saying this contradicts the military action from February. How does the administration answer that?
Rubio's argument is that the military strike was leverage—it proved Trump was willing to act. Now he's using that credibility to negotiate from strength. Whether that's true or just a story to sell the deal is the real question.
What's the sticking point on uranium?
Iran won't hand over its enriched uranium stockpile. That's the crown jewel of their program. They'll talk about limits, inspections, timelines—but surrendering what they've already produced is a different conversation entirely.
So this could still fall apart?
Easily. The fact that they're not signing on Sunday tells you everything. Both sides are still too far apart on the things that matter most.