We knew this would happen. We were ready for it.
González confirmed her relationship with Mazzei remains strong and that he was informed from day one about her reconciliation with Suar, the father of her son. The couple has been together nearly two decades since meeting on set around 2007-2008, married since December 2013, and maintains a low-profile approach to their relationship.
- González and Mazzei have been together nearly 20 years, married since December 2013
- She reconciled with Adrián Suar, father of her son Tomás, at a theater
- Mazzei was informed from day one about the reconciliation with Suar
- The couple is experiencing a dispute with a company, not a relationship crisis
Argentine actress Araceli González called into a TV show to clarify she is not separated from partner Fabián Mazzei, stating they anticipated media speculation following her recent reconciliation with ex-partner Adrián Suar.
Araceli González picked up the phone and called into LAM, the gossip show on América TV, to set the record straight. The rumor mill had been spinning all week: whispers that she and Fabián Mazzei, her partner of nearly two decades, were on the rocks. The speculation had started after she was spotted reconciling with Adrián Suar, the father of her son Tomás, at a theater. In the entertainment world, a public moment like that doesn't stay quiet for long.
But González wasn't calling to deny the reconciliation with Suar. She was calling to clarify what it actually meant. "We knew this would happen—people saying we were going through a rough patch," she said on air, her tone matter-of-fact. She and Mazzei had already braced for it. They'd talked about it beforehand. They knew how the story would read.
What mattered to her was being clear about one thing: Mazzei knew. From day one. She had sent Suar a greeting, looking to repair what had been broken between them. He responded. A conversation started—a good one, she said. And the moment it began, she told her partner. "My partner always wanted us to be reconciled," González explained. "Everything he knows about from day one. We're not in crisis. We did have a dispute with the company, but everything is perfect, we're in the best moment, and we knew this could happen."
González and Mazzei had built something durable in an industry not known for durability. They met on a film or television set sometime between 2007 and 2008, two people working in the same space who decided to build a life together. For years they kept it quiet, low-key, the kind of relationship that doesn't feed the tabloids because the people in it don't want it to. In December 2013, they married. Nearly two decades later, they were still there, still choosing each other, still navigating the peculiar pressure of being a couple in the public eye while trying not to be.
The dispute with the company she mentioned—that was real friction, a professional disagreement that had nothing to do with their marriage. But that's not what the gossip shows wanted to talk about. They wanted the story of a split, a betrayal, a reconciliation with an ex that spelled the end of something else. González was saying: that's not the story. The story is that we're transparent with each other. The story is that we anticipated you'd misread this. The story is that we're still here.
She had faced the speculation head-on rather than let it fester in silence. In doing so, she'd offered a small window into how a long partnership actually works—not as a fairy tale immune to outside pressure, but as something that requires communication, trust, and the willingness to explain yourself when the world gets it wrong.
Notable Quotes
My partner always wanted us to be reconciled. Everything he knows about from day one. We're not in crisis.— Araceli González, on LAM
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
When she called into the show, was she angry, or was this more strategic—getting ahead of the narrative?
Neither, really. She sounded tired of the assumption that reconciliation with an ex automatically means your current relationship is failing. She was correcting the logic, not defending herself.
But why call at all? Why not just let it blow over?
Because in her world, silence reads as confirmation. If she didn't say anything, the story becomes "she's hiding something." By calling in, she's saying: I have nothing to hide, and here's the proof.
Do you think Mazzei appreciated being put on the spot like that?
He was already on the spot. She was actually protecting him by being the one to speak first, by making clear he knew everything. It's harder to speculate about someone's betrayal when the person involved has already said there was no betrayal.
What about her son—does he know his parents are reconciling?
That's the part she didn't address, and maybe that's the real story underneath. A child watching his mother and father find their way back to civility. That's not gossip. That's just life.
So this whole thing—the call, the explanation—it's really about protecting the kid?
It's about protecting everyone. The kid, the partnership with Mazzei, her own dignity. She's saying: we're handling this like adults, and we're doing it together.